Can you pick a better England team from those playing every week?

I've been looking at the next England squad for the upcoming internationals in October and there are more and more problems mounting for Roy Hodgson in his future selections. Only ten to fifteen years ago Sven Goran Eriksson would see a player playing for a Champions League team as the main criteria for being selected for the team, if not the squad.

We haven't got a great record in this year's Champions League as it is, especially after last night's poor showing by both Arsenal and Chelsea, but even ignoring that fact we have a very small pool of players that are starters for Champions League teams. For that matter we have very few players that are starters for Premier League team at the moment.

Below are the players that could be possibly considered as England internationals that actually started for their clubs in the last round of Premier League fixtures-

Manchester United
Chris Smalling
Michael Carrick
Wayne Rooney

Manchester City
Raheem Sterling

Tottenham Hotspur
Kyle Walker
Eric Dier
Harry Kane

West Ham United
Carl Jenkinson
James Tomkins
Aaron Cresswell

Arsenal
Theo Walcott

Leicester City
Jamie Vardy

Everton
Phil Jagielka
Ross Barkley

West Bromwich Albion
Saido Berahino

Crystal Palace
Scott Dann

Liverpool
Nathaniel Clyne
James Milner
Daniel Sturridge

Aston Villa
Scott Sinclair
Jack Grealish

Southanpton
Ryan Bertrand
James Ward-Prowse

Swansea City
Jonjo Shelvey

Chelsea
Gary Cahill

Newcastle United
Jack Colback

Stoke City
Jack Butland

Now, of course this is a snapshot and it ignores players such as Joe Hart (slight injury worry) and the likes of Phil Jones, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Keiran Gibbs that suffer with rotation at their clubs.

I'd like to think that being first choice for your team is a pre-requisite for selection for the national team, and based on that criteria here is my England team for the next internationals, whilst looking to the future.

Jack Butland
Nathaniel Clyne
Gary Cahill
Scott Dann
Aaron Cresswell
James Milner
James Ward-Prowse
Jonjo Shelvey
Raheem Sterling
Jamie Vardy
Harry Kane

I know that there's a lot of attacking intent in this team, and I'd look to a 4-3-3 formation with Vardy and Sterling working back along the wings to provide cover for the midfield three of Shelvey, Milner and Ward-Prowse. I think that we need to get over the early hurdles at European Championships and World Cups and this consistent failure is because of a few reasons-

Too little competition then too much competition
We have gone through many qualifying competitions where we've had no real opposition to stretch us and make us think about how we approach games and play the game. WE then go from this straight into a competition where we play good teams and fail. The FA has tried to deal with this for the upcoming European Championships by setting up friendlies against Spain and France and reports of friendlies against Germany and the Netherlands. I think that's all we can do as a nation to prepare. But we need to take the friendlies seriously and out out our best team, play competitively and try to win.

Not enough preparation time
This is a problem that's brought about by the popularity of the game and the money-making activities of the Premier League and the Premier League clubs. Chasing the dollar by having post-season tours, pre-season tours and friendlies does damage the quality of the product by increasing the quantity. This is going to have to be part of a root-and-branch review of the game at the top level and something will have to give - either the FA Cup, the League Cup, the Europa League, dropping the number of teams in the Premier League or limiting the off-season activity of clubs. I can't see any of these things happening.

Picking players that play
This is the idea from the list above. I have looked at players that play football for their clubs week-in, week-out as potential representatives of their country. There are 27 players in my list above and they would make a reasonable international squad. More importantly they would make a squad of players that are playing football at the top level in the country and you can filter the 27 down to the 11 with the best form to move the country forwards. I always liken the situation to the way Greece won the European Championships in 2004 with a team of "nobodies." But they were a team that worked hard together, knew their game plan and won by playing to their strengths.

We can do this with the work-rate of Vardy, the speed of Sterling, the goals of Kane and the possession of the midfield 3. If Greece did it, then why can't we?

The future for protected international fixture dates

This is a short blog post today, after the International break to look at what the break does for players of the top clubs as they return. The new Euro qualifiers have changed somewhat, and the games are now spread over several days - I suspect to make the most of the television opportunities. And it wasn't until I watched some of the Wales v Israel game that I thought about the impact it has on the players and their clubs. The commentator stated that Wales had the worst of it, because they played away on the first day of games, so had little time to prepare their players and then played again soon after - this time at home. Now. I'm not one of these people that thinks that players should just play and not complain. I've seen and heard people argue that when players are paid so much, they should just get on with it. I, however, think that when a club pays millions upon millions for a player, they want them to perform to their best. And this involves having them rested at certain points, and playing every 3 or 4 days at other points of the season. And there is always (in this modern world) the business side of things to consider. The players are seen as assets, appearing on the balance sheets and many players are discarded for a fee in the last year of their contract, rather than let it run down and they go for free.

So, where does that leave international teams, international fixtures and the fans of the national teams? I'd consider myself a mild England fan. I've not been to an England match for years, I don't watch England friendlies on TV. I don't hold out much hope for us as we enter the big tournaments. But I'd dearly miss the national team if they disappeared. The nuances of players having loyalties to clubs and countries is a major part of the modern game. Sir Alex Ferguson's "rotation" system where he would only let a certain proportion of his squad go on international duty at the same time epitomises the feeling a that clubs have towards national sides. The World Cup is still the pinnacle of the game and stands above the Champions League. But the gap between them is getting smaller every year (or every four years.)

As a club manager, having your players potentially returning from international duty in different days, and in different states of fitness must be a major headache. Players travelling back from the four corners of the earth having played only 24 or 48 hours before can disrupt the best laid plans. Add in the knocks and injuries that players pick up and you have to assess your whole squad in no time at all to establish your best eleven for the next match.

But football is relentless - as is the demand from the broadcasters. I've read somewhere that when the draw was made and the teams were sorted into groups, that the groups with seven teams in were protected so that they had to contain the big nations - Germany, Spain and England. And this was so they didn't end up in the smaller groups, playing less games, having less games on television.

I can't reconcile this in my mind. The big clubs pay huge transfer fees and cashes for the best players and then lose their services for many weeks of the year. The players will want to finish their career with as many World Cups under their belts as possible. The national teams want their best players representing them at the peak of their fitness.