Watching the football coaches on FNF

I have been on an FA coaching course recently and it was a really good way to get into the coaching of my kids football team. The course was very comprehensive and will help me no end on my coaching journey. But what it wasn't was a complete journey. It is meant to set me off to go and learn about what we are doing as coaches and learn and adapt.

One of the tips at the end of the course was to go out and watch other coaches. I have watched some local games to see what other amateur coaches are doing and it all fits quite nicely with the way I want my players to play the game. And this is also the way that the FA want the game to be played in this country.

And I try to watch what the coaches are up to when I watch the big BPL matches like Chelsea v Liverpool tonight. Antonio Conte and Jurgen Klopp are coaches with impressive records behind them and will both be looking for a Champions League place this season.

Obviously you don't get to see as much as you would like of the coaches from a television screen but the glimpses that are shown are fascinating. Players don't hear the vast majority of what a coach says in the heat of the match against the noise from the crowd. But some coaches scream and shout as though their lives depended on it. Meaningful input to players close by would be more effective.

I hope to bring a style of play to my team. We will pass the ball around and stay true to this all the time. Let's hope that the way Chelsea and Liverpool play tonight shows the way!

El Clasico clashes with Manchester City v Liverpool - who will win out?

As El Classico clashes with the Man City v Liverpool match on Sky Sports tonight, I think it's time to ask whether the global game has taken over the Premier League.

What will you watch?

Real Madrid v Barcelona?

Man City v Liverpool?

Or take the option with Sky to watch it split screen? Is like to see a breakdown on the viewing figures.

When I was young, teams from outside of England, Scotland and Wales seemed a million miles away. Players with exotic-sounding names from different pockets of the globe has their own thing going on.

When Steve Archibald went to Barcelona, my world changed a little. He was the first top player in my memory that had made such a switch. It looked like a massive adventure that bordered on madness. Likewise for overseas players coming to the English league. Ossie Ardiles was my first memory of a player coming in the opposite direction.

Now the Premier League is awash with great players from as far and wide as Senegal, New Zealand, USA, Chile and a plethora of Spaniards, French and Dutch. There has been much lament of how this affects the England national team. But it's not the relative lack of success of the England team that worries me in this blog. It's a problem that is typified by the matches I mentioned at the top of the blog. The Premier League bills itself at different times as-

"The best league in the world"

"The most competitive league in the world"

"The most exciting league in the world"

And these have always been selling points as the league sells itself over the world for TV money. And as the Premier League loses it's standing against the big matches from other leagues and potentially losing their 4th Champions League place-

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10005194/premier-leagues-fourth-champions-league-spot-under-threat-from-serie-a

The Premier League has grown on the back of the massive TV deal after massive TV deal and they don't expect it to stop anytime soon. But if Sky find that more people tune in for El Clasico than a top Premier League clash then they may not pay quite so much in their next deal. Broadcasters from other countries could follow suit and this will mean that the power of the Premier League wanes.

I can see this being more of a big deal for the Premier League power brokers than any loss of status for the England team.

Liverpool couldn't decide where the blip was

The sacking of Brendan Rodgers from Liverpool hasn't really gone as a big suprise to the football community. Being a Liverpool manager that doesn't win trophies is a treacherous position. Rodgers has paid the price for the success of past managers and the fans still believe that it's the 1980's and that they are the world's biggest club. To compete in the top level, Champions League is an absolute must and Liverpool haven't been able to deliver that consistently. This affects both their recruitment and their ability to keep hold of their top players.

Any dressing room that had lost players of the quality and character of Luis Suarez, Steven Gerrard, Jamie Carragher and Raheem Sterling in a short period of time would suffer. The influence, passion and connection with the fans that both Carragher and Gerrard carried can't be replaced in the transfer market. Suarez and Sterling wanted to play on the Champions League and Liverpool can't make those promises.

To my mind, though the biggest question is "when was the blip?"

The first season for any manager can be put to one side, unless they make a complete mess of things like Paolo Di Canio did at Sunderland. It's a chance for a new manager to assess the existing players. A chance to bring in some new faces and establish their own philosophy and playing style. And Rodgers got this.

His second season was the one where the team played fantastic attacking football and were a Gerrard slip away from possibly winning the league. Suarez the player was magnificent that season, even if Suarez the man reared his ugly head more than once. The partnership with Sterling and Sturridge often blew teams away. Matches were over before they started as a flurry of Liverpool goals flew in and the opposition has no answer.

Then last season was very poor - in fact if you ignore in a great run in the middle it was awful. The Suarez money (and more) was largely squandered as the flawed transfer committee bought Mario Balotelli, Rickie Lambert, Dejan Lovren and Lazar Markovic among others.

And so to the Summer of 2015 and the conversations with the board about the blip. I'm sure that Rodgers maintained that the season 2014/15 was the blip. This was the season that things went a little bit wrong, and that the 2nd place and title challenge of 2013/14 was the real Rodgers Liverpool. But from the outside it appeared obvious what had happened. The 2nd place was a Suarez-inspired feat and not one brought about by Brendan Rodgers. The goals scored by Suarez weren't just plentiful, they were scored at crucial times to kill teams off and win games they otherwise wouldn't have won.

FSG and the hierarchy should have spotted this Summer that the blip was the good season and not the bad. I think that they felt some loyalty towards the man that had given the club their first shot at the league for a long, long time.

What's next? For Liverpool probably Juergen Klopp. For Rodgers it's time to start rebuilding that reputation a little. Sunderland are looking for a new manager and a new direction.....

Where have these release clauses appeared from?

Another transfer looks close to completion in the early part of next week as it's reported that Liverpool have met the release clause in Christian Benteke's contract. The clause is reported to be £32.5 million.

It's got me thinking about these release clauses and what they say about modern football.

In the example of Christian Benteke I'll have a look at what I think might have happened. Benteke was bought for £7m from Genk in August 2012 at the age of 22. Villa spent a lot of money in a player they saw as having huge potential and fitting into their style of play. The player probably saw Aston Villa as a stepping stone and either during the initial negotiations or a new contract, wanted a clause in his contract allowing this to happen. Villa wanted this to be a high figure and at the time probably thought that £32.5m for a player they bought for only £7m was probably good business. Since then, Benteke became the driving force at the club - going a long way towards keeping them up ever since signing. The club now feel quite reluctant to see one of their leaders leave, especially one so loved by their fans. So they dig their heels in and say to any suitor - "There's the release clause. If you want the player then that's what you have to pay." Liverpool are flush with the cash from selling Raheem Sterling and still haven't replaced the goals that Luis Suarez gave them. They have no choice but to pay.

I don't remember release clauses mentioned in transfer negotiations when I was a kid. But there wasn't anywhere near as much money in the game as there is nowadays.

In my eyes, the phenomenon started about ten years ago with the release clause quotes in the contracts of the players of Spanish clubs. But these don't seem to work in the same way. We're always hearing release clauses quoted of €50m to €150m but players no exchanging hands for those prices. And then there was the stand-off between Liverpool and Arsenal over the transfer of Luis Suarez. Only after Suarez had reconciled himself with Liverpool, did they reveal that there was a release clause but they decided to ignore it.

So, do they have a future in the game. I'd like to see them used in the way that Aston Villa, Christian Benteke and Liverpool have used them. Benteke gets his chance in a bigger league, Aston Villa get well rewarded for nurturing his talent and turning him into a player that the big clubs cover and Liverpool get a proven Premier League performer at a definite price.

Liverpool's transfer dealings indicate Sterling is on his way

Sunderland have made their first signing of the pre-season with the turning of Sebastian Coates loan into a permanent transfer. It's a good signing based in his form towards the end of the season. The next step is to add some more quality to the squad with the acquisition of a right back, another centre back, a central midfielder and a left-sided attacking midfielder or winger.

But it's the transfer dealings of Liverpool that interest me the most this Summer as they have already added six players and look determined to add Christian Benteke as well. They spent heavily with the windfall from the Luis Suarez sale last Summer and they must now have a huge squad with some pretty mediocre players taking up precious pounds on the wage bill. The next task will be to move on 8 to 12 of their under-achievers to balance the books and the squad. The likes of Fabio Borini, Mario Balotelli and Rickie Lambert haven't cut the mustard and there will probably be takers for them given their past records at other clubs.

But all this activity leads me to the conclusion that the biggest English deal of the transfer window has already been lined up. It's the outgoing transfer of Raheem Sterling - probably to Manchester City. City are looking to spend again and reinvest in their homegrown quotas for European competition. Having lost James Milner and Micah Richards and their academy not bringing through talent quickly enough, this is where they will have to spend big.

The days of a club selling a player and then looking for replacements with the money changed when Daniel Levy spent the Gareth Bale cash before the Bale deal was finalised and Liverpool have repeated the trick this Summer with Sterling. But Liverpool don't seem to have solved the problem that the Suarez departure left them with. A season without Suarez and Sturridge has shown the difference that goals make to a team, so a fit and firing Christian Benteke looks like their most important signing of the transfer window.

Elsewhere there hasn't been a flurry of activity with the odd signing here and there but there will be plenty of transfers to come with most bus expected to sign at least four or five players.

There's much more to come!

Silly season

We're in the off season and fast approaching the opening of the transfer window. With the season seemingly starting earlier every year (8th August is the first round of Premier League fixtures this time) and ore-season tours to all parts of the globe, my view is that teams should get their business done early.

It's surprising to me how long it takes to pull a transfer together. If you take the point in time that a rumour first surfaces as the starting point, then we often see the process take over a month to come to fruition. Take my own club Sunderland and their reported pursuit if Carl Jenkinson. Reports linking us to a right back have gone in every Summer and January for years. This time, the interest in Jenkinson started about 3 weeks ago, according to reports. A loan fee of £1.5million has been widely reported, as has interest from West Ham and Southampton. Now the Saints bought a new right back yesterday so may nick longer be after Jenkinson. From my understanding of business, the situation from the outside looks like the player has a choice of clubs, probably dependent on speaking to the managers and then a medical and a deal can be done. But these things tend to drag out for weeks.

Deadline day seems to be the only thing that concentrates the minds of all the respective parties to get the deal done.

The rumours this season, as always, rest around the players from clubs just outside of the top teams who had a great season last year. Nathaniel Clyne is highly sought after, and Southampton's new right back sends hints that he's about to leave. Liverpool are reported to be front of the queue, but Manchester United could do with a quality right back.

The Danny Ings saga has finished with Liverpool beating off reported competition from Real Sociedad, Bayern Munich and a host of English clubs.

Charlie Austin is another English goalscorer who will be in demand all over the Premier League. Newcastle and West Ham needs goals and would ha e the resources for the transfer fee and his wages.

We shall see.